2. In this conaction.
to refer
I am
4
the correspondence, trumenating
With
44
the latter from
this
the 20th ultimo,
ript of the 26th,
efending the question, shelter
the Convention, referred
to above of the subregent Boundary Apeement confer on her Majesty's for any freshal rights in huss Bay Trap Bay, 89g am to que los for Lond
Salisbury's a formation,
a
copy of the Law Offias Junion on this question, h
togather with a
стре од
It
q
Hay Kay Blue-book, referred
to in that opini
a
copy of a letter which
ht
has ban addressed to
tho.
£20.150.
1
the admiralty
the subject
§ # 120
and subject to verification as suggested below
3. Mr Chamberlain is
further adiend by the 358 attorney fineral that if
a mass of ther colony, attended, is to be published,
it should show the extreme licit of Butish teritory of the teritory, which this country may lyitinatily claim, a that it should, therefore, show the fore-shore
bring of the Bays
British.
4.
assumes
من
Mr Chambdain
could be glad to know,
that
whether in Lord Salis hang's
Opinion entry objections
are likely to be raised by the thinnest forment, if a
make us to blished showing the fore-shoe British. Subject to this Consideratend of that is,
he is aware, So far
no objection to the map,
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.